According to Tan Sri Dato Seri(x9) Vincent Tan Chee Yioun:
"There is no difference between Vincent Tan and Berjaya Group ... they are synonymous".........
(Source:Articles Cast Plaintiff In Bad Light, Ccourt Told
12 October 1994,Business Times Singapore)
According to VK Lingam:
And you know why, actually, I am very grateful with Tan Sri Vincent Tan you know why, I brainwash you so much even I quarrel with him. One day I went to Vincent Tan house, I fire him at the night in his house. I said very hell if you don’t do this who will do it?
All these people Tun Eusoff Chin, Datuk Ahmad Fairuz, Tan Sri Zainon all fought for that.Then he called Tengku Adnan. Tengku Adnan he said, saya bukan Perdana Menteri Malaysia lah, you know. If the old man doesn’t want to listen to me, go to hell.
He quarreled with me. I said nevermind, nevermind, you talk to PM again tomorrow morning to put Datuk Ahmad Fairuz to CJM. So next day morning he went and he called me back 9.30 that he said PM has already agreed. So I said nevermind, we hope for the best. So I said no harm trying, the worst that it can happen is that you lose. Being the old man, he is 76 years old, he gets whispers everywhere, and then you don’t whisper, he get taken away by the other side. But, now PM is very alert because every time he gets letters from Tan Sri Zaidin, he called Tengku Adnan, he said discuss with Vincent, come and discuss.
(http://www.keadilanrakyat.org/index.php/content/view/284/98/)
The following persons are directors of Berjaya Corporation:
DATO’ HJ MD YUSOFF @ MOHD YUSOFF BIN JAAFAR
59 years of age, Malaysian
Independent Non-Executive Director
Dato’ Hj Md Yusoff @ Mohd Yusoff Bin Jaafar was appointed to the Board of the Company on 15 September 2005 in conjunction with the restructuring exercise of Berjaya Group Berhad. He has been a Director of Berjaya Group Berhad since 25 August 2003. He graduated from the University of Science Malaysia, Penang, in 1978 with a Bachelor of Social Science (Hons) degree majoring in Political Science and a minor in Ethnic Relations. He began his 34-year career with the Royal Malaysian Police Force as a trainee Probationary Inspector in 1969. He was selected to the Special Branch Department the following year where he held various commanding positions. Between 1983 and 1990, he was Head of the Special Branch in Terengganu before being seconded to the Head Office at Bukit Aman, Kuala Lumpur, where he served for a period of 2 years. He was then posted to the Special Branch Training Institution, Jalan Gurney, Kuala Lumpur as a Commandant before his promotion as Deputy Chief Police Officer of Pulau Pinang and Pahang. Prior to his retirement in May 2003, he was in Terengganu as the Chief Police Officer of the State and
his last commanding post in the police was as the Commissioner of Police, Sarawak. He
is also actively involved in various community organisations and has served as the Special Advisor to the Ministry of Social Development and Urbanisation Sarawak.
Dato’ Hj Md Yusoff @ Mohd Yusoff Bin Jaafar is a member of the Audit Committee of the
Company
MOHD ZAIN BIN AHMAD
54 years of age, Malaysian
Independent Non-Executive Director
He was appointed to the Board of the Company on 15 September 2005 in conjunction
with the restructuring exercise of Berjaya Group Berhad. He has been a Director of Berjaya Group Berhad since 25 August 2003.
He holds a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Buckingham, England and a
Certificate in Legal Practice. He also holds Diploma in Syariah Law & Practice from International Islamic University Malaysia and Public Administration from Universiti Teknologi MARA.
He began his career with the Royal Malaysian Police Force as a police inspector in 1971. He was promoted to Assistant Superintendent of Police in 1980 and served until 1986. He was admitted as an Advocate and Solicitor of the High Court of Malaya on 25 October 1986.
TAN SRI DATUK ABDUL RAHIM BIN HAJI DIN
67 years of age, Malaysian
Independent Non-Executive Director
He was appointed to the Board of the Company on 15 September 2005 in conjunction
with the restructuring exercise of Berjaya Group Berhad. He has been a Director of Berjaya
Group Berhad since 19 September 1996.
He graduated with a degree in Bachelor of Arts from Universiti Malaya in 1963 and obtained his Master of Business Administration from the University of Detroit, United States of America in 1976.
Prior to joining Berjaya Group Berhad, he served as the Secretary-General in the Ministry of Home Affairs from 1992 until his retirement in September 1996. From 1987 to 1991, he was the General Manager of the Employees Provident Fund before becoming the Deputy Group Chief Officer of Permodalan Nasional Berhad, a post he held from 1991 to 1992. He also holds directorships in several other private limited companies.
Tan Sri Datuk Abdul Rahim Bin Haji Din is a member of the Audit Committee, Nomination
Committee and Remuneration Committee of the Company.
http://www.berjaya.com.my/home/archive/annualreport06/corporation/bjcorp_2006.pdf
The person named below is a director of Berjaya Land:
DATUK MAIZAN BIN SHAARI
59 years of age, Malaysian
Independent Non-Executive
He was appointed to the Board on 8 December 2004. He holds a Bachelor of Arts
(Sociology & Anthropology) from University of Malaya and a Master of Arts (Political
Science) from Ohio University, USA.
He joined the Royal Malaysian Police in 1973 and rose to become the Director of the
Narcotics Department in 1998. Prior to 1998, he had held various positions in the
Police Force. From 1999 to 2000, he was the Deputy Director of Criminal Investigation
Department. He was also the Director of Commercial Crime Division since 2000 before
retiring from the civil service in September 2003.
Currently, he is also a Director in Dunham-Bush (Malaysia) Bhd and Berjaya General
Insurance Berhad.
Datuk Maizan Bin Shaari is a member of the Audit Committee of the Company.
http://www.berjaya.com.my/home/archive/annualreport06/land/bjland_2006.pdf
The following persons are directors of Berjaya Toto:
TAN SRI DATO' JAFFAR BIN ABDUL
(Independent/Non-Executive)
70 years of age, Malaysian
He was appointed to the Board on 28 August 1997 as an Independent Non-
Executive Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee. He joined the Police
Force in 1951 and rose to become Director of the Anti-Narcotic Branch,
Federal Police Headquarters, in 1982. From 1982 to 1984, he was the Chief
Police Officer in Johor and between 1984 to 1985, he was the Director of
Management Police Headquarters in Bukit Aman since 1985. He was also the
Deputy Inspector General of the Royal Malaysian Police since 1985 before
retiring from the civil service in May 1989. He is currently the Chairman of
Cosway Corporation Berhad, Mycom Berhad, Anson Perdana Berhad, Yinson
Holdings Berhad and Perdana Industrial Holdings Berhad. He is also a
Director in Olympia Industries Berhad, Angkasa Marketing Berhad,
Amalgamated Containers Berhad and several other private limited companies.
MOHAMED SALEH BIN GOMU
(Independent/Non-Executive)
52 years of age, Malaysian
He was appointed to the Board on 22 December 1999 as an Independent
Non-Executive Director. He joined Polis Diraja Malaysia ("PDRM") as an
Inspector in June 1970 and left for England to further his studies in 1981. He
graduated with a Bachelor of Laws (Hons) Degree in 1982 and obtained a
Certificate in Legal Practice in 1984. Upon graduation, he continued to serve
PDRM in various capacities including as a Staff Officer in the Special Branch,
Officer-in-charge of Prosecution (Lower Courts) Kuala Lumpur and Officer-incharge
of Brickfields Police District. Before his optional retirement in June
1992, he was Head of the INTERPOL/National Central Bureau Secretariat.
Soon after his retirement, he went into private legal practice. Currently, he is
also a Director in Kumpulan Emas Berhad and Omega Holdings Berhad.
http://www.berjaya.com.my/home/archive/annualreport06/toto/bjtoto_2006_chairmansta_eng.pdf
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
WOW..that's a lot of policemen!
being a police is a sure way to richness!
Dear Friends (reporters of Singapore ST.Times)
I am sending to all of you copy of my latest letter to the CHIEF JUDGE OF MALAYSIA to draw his attention to the sort of nonsense that pass for their administration of the judicial & legal process. I have a grivence against Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali of the Malaysian Court of Appeal. I set up my own blog site at http://yapchongyee.blogspot.com to NAME AND SHAME this judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, because she acted criminally. READ MY BLOG because my story is too long.
I hope you all will help to spread my letters to show every one how shameful and comical the Malaysian judiciary is.
Yap Chong Yee,
5a Prinsep Road,
Attadale, W. Australia,
Date :
To,
The President,
Court of Appeal,
Putra Jaya, Malaysia,
Your Honour (YAA),
Re :KL High Court Originating Petition No. : D2-26-41-2001
Lim Choi Yin v. McLaren Saksama(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. & 5 others.
I charge Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali of the Malaysian Court of Appeal for acting in conspiracy with my wife’s solicitors, M/s Lim & Hoh of Ming Building, Bukit Nanas, Kuala Lumpur to cause my wife’s said above petition to be CONDEMNED & CONSIGNED to the legal limbo of the Court of Appeal.
My charge against Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali for acting in conspiracy with my wife’s solicitor M/s Lim & Hoh to pervert the course of justice, and for the purpose of protecting three criminals respondents of the said petition namely, Wong Kem Chen, Stephen Lim Cheng Ban & Kwong Sea Yoon from Prosecution for PERJURY & FORGERY, perverting the course of justice, fraud, obtaining money by false pretenses, fabricating evidence and other criminal offences.
Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali perpetrated these criminal offences by knowingly refusing leave for the petitioner to cross examine said 3 criminal respondents for perjury, AND THEN TO AWARD TO RESPONDENTS TWO ORDERS (1) ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS AS THE FIRST ORDER and then (2)ORDER FOR STRIKING OUT SAID PETITION AFTER THE RESPONDENTS HAD EXECUTED & ENFORCED THEIR ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS, by the respondents accepting the payment of RM.60,000
Please take note that Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali HAD AWARDED THE ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS AHEAD OF THE ORDER FOR STRIKING OUT. This fact confirmed the execution & enforcement of the order for security for costs BY THE RESPONDENTS & by JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI. Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali knowing that after petitioner had paid the sum of RM.60,000 being the security for costs she ordered, an open court hearing of the petition will follow as a matter of course and this hearing will cause the said 3 criminals to be cross examined FOR perjury & forgery, and hence face criminal prosecution. It was upon payment by petitioner of the security for costs that caused the respondents to apply for striking out of said petition; and Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, being fully aware of these circumstances proceeded to prevent this from developing by awarding to respondents THE FURTHER ORDER TO STRIKE OUT PETITION. Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali knows that although she had no power to award her 2nd order for striking out, the respondents having executed & enforced their order for security for costs, awarded the order for striking out anyway, KNOWING THAT HER ORDER FOR STRIKING OUT WILL CONSIGN & CONDEMN THE FATE OF SAID PETITION TO THE LIMBO OF TIMELESSNESS.
My charge against my wife’s solicitors M/s Lim & Hoh is that they did not oppose respondents’ application for striking out of petition. My wife’s solicitors wrote to us complaining that every time I wrote officially to complain of the misconduct of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali , SHE WOULD haul up Mr David Hoh, my wife’s counsel to her office to face her. It is for this reason that I conclude that Mr. David Hoh had been instructed not to oppose respondents’ application for striking out said petition. I do not believe that all the parties namely, Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, together with the criminal behaviour of Stephen Lim & Wong kem Chen & Kwong Sea Yoon, the lawyers of M/s Annad & Noraini (solicitors) respondent applicants’ solicitors who represented respondents in their application for the order for striking out, and who committed subornation of perjury in their preparation of the affidavit of Stephen Lim Cheng Ban that supported their application for striking out of petition because the signatures on the documents that were annexed to the affidavit of respondent Stephen Lim Cheng ban even merely at a glance when compared to my wife’s true signature affixed to her many affidavits will show obvious & glaring differences and therefore cannot be taken to have been the true signature of my wife’s..
The ACTION OF JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI to award her order for striking out to the respondents was not due to her obvious professional INCOMPETENCE. She had to have encouraged M/s Annad & Noraini (solicitors for the respondents), to proceed to apply for striking out with her obvious support, and to instruct Mr David Hoh not to oppose respondents’ application for striking out said petition. For the respondents to succeed in their application to strike out, it COULD ONLY be achieved by the conspiracy of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali leading the other co conspirators of M/s Annad & Noraini committing SUBORNATION OF PERJURY & abetting forgery & fabrication of evidence, and for Mr David Hoh, under the influence of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali TO NOT OPPOSE RESPONDENTS’ APPLICATION FOR STRIKING OUT. It is too much to ask me to believe that all of these PROFESSIONAL LAWYERS CAN OVER LOOK THE OBVIOUS FACT THAT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES ALL & I MEAN ALL THESE LAWYERS CAN TOGETHER NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE DOING ?
The two opposing orders for an order for security for costs followed by an order for striking out cannot be made by any SANE JUDGE hearing the petition because a COURT OF JUSTICE OF LAW & EQUITY JUST CANNOT MAKE SUCH NONSENSE ORDERS; one order says “YES”, and at the same time the other ORDER says “NO”.
There is the not so often used criminal offence & of tort OF MALFEASANCE, I have already written on this offence in my blog. However, an officer of the court commits malfeasance when he/she omits to do WHAT IS REQUIRED OF HIM/HER TO DO BY LAW AND SUCH omission CAUSE DAMAGE OR LOSS TO THE INDIVIDUAL. Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali committed malfeasance BECAUSE SHE IS BOUND BY LAW,(having first enforced her order for security for costs at the behest of the 3 criminals Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Kwong Sea Yoon & Wong Kem Chen.) AND UPON PETITIONER HAVING PAID SAID RM.60,000 WAS REQUIRED BY THE RULES OF THE HIGH COURT TO ORDER A HEARING OF THE PETITION AND SHE OMMITTED TO ALLOW THE HEARING OF THE PETITION. The penalty for malfeasance is dismissal from her judgeship and of course open to be sued in tort.
My research tells me that proof of intention to commit malfeasance is not required. The fact that defendant omitted to do what is required by law for her to do constitutes the offence. Having discussed the point, I will charge Mr David Hoh with Malfeasance because he too omitted to apply to strike out respondents’ application for striking out said petition; not to mention that I will sue him for damages for negligence & malfeasance.
Yours faithfully
Yapchongyee
Copy :
(1)Attorney General’s Dept., (2) President & Secretary Malaysian Bar Council
(3)M/s Lim & Hoh (by fax) (4)Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali (Ct. of App.)
(5)E-mail to all and sundry of the Malaysian Bar
The Malay UMNO leaders have learned to “spin” and project a feel good factor into their public statements relating to their most diabolical projects and making them appear to be advantageous to their intended victims (their minority races). The Americans and the NAZIS are masters of this art (created by Dr Goebbels, Nazis Propaganda Minister and spin was the Nazis tool to implement Hitler’s holocaust and the eradication of the Jews in Europe); as for example George W. Bush had secret plans to attack Iraq and steal Iraqi oil, the Pentagon spin doctors put out a barrage of public statements that Saddam was a beast & dictator and had to be removed for the good of the Iraqi people. This is spin concealing their true evil purpose behind sweet words that are aimed at masking the evil behind the words.
I just heard “Syed Albar” explain that the Malaysian Government is very reluctant to abuse their Internal Security Act, to jail activists as they had done to Hindraff leaders. This is the most diabolical spin if ever I heard one. The Malaysian Government had at the drop of a hat would resort to the excesses of the ISA for the slightest of excuse. I remember how the Government abused the ISA to jail willy nilly 2 bit gansters. I had last night visitors from KL for dinner and the discussion veered to the Hindraff riot and the jailing of their leaders for attempted MURDER ? This is the height of the abuse of the Law. The truth is the Malaysian Government are never accountable; they do as they please.
Coming back to our dinner discussion, my guests tells me and I can see the sense in their point of view; that the Hindraff Riot was a peaceful demonstration BUT THAT THE POLICE WERE INSTRUCTED TO PROVOKE A VIOLENT REACTION. Why did the police acted in the manner (with violent water cannons laced with dangerous chemicals; and tear gas grenades). IF YOU CARE TO EXAMINE THE VIDEO OF THE POLICE RESPONSE, YOU WOULD FIND THAT IT WAS THE POLICE THAT CAUSED FEAR & CHAOS, firing into unarmed & totally helpless Indians who were out to demonstrate their dire economic DUES as citizens of Malaysia. The did not deserve such callous and overly harsh abuse by armed police who bludgeoned them to within an inch of their lives. My guests were correct in their assessment of the brutality of police over reaction; UMNO leaders planned to cause the ILLUSION OF POLITICAL UP HEAVAL SO THAT THEY CAN HAVE THE OPTION TO DELAY THE UPCOMING ELECTION SET FOR 2009 BECAUSE DATO ANWAR IBRAHIM WILL BE FREE TO CONTEST THE ELECTION. I truly believe that if the indications on the Malaysian political scene was that UMNO will not win they will use the excuse of the Hindaff riot to impose EMERGENCY AND POSTPONE THE ELECTION.
Consider this proposition, how is it that UMNO is able to govern Malaysia for the last 50 years, WHEN UMNO IS UNABLE TO WIN IN ELECTIONS IN KELANTAN & TRENGGANU (both predominantly Malay constituencies ) ? I do not believe that support from both MIC & MCA (both ethnic parties are not representative of Indian & Chinese support). In the MIC I do not believe that Sammy Vellu has the genuine support of the Indians, hence this riot demonstrates that he does not have their support. In the MCA, their leadership too is all self serving and the MCA does not truly represent Chinese interests. Both the MIC & MCA are retained by UMNO to give the semblance of across the board support of all the communities that make up Malaysian society BUT IN TRUTH THE GOVERNMENT DISHONESTLY MANIPULATES THE BOLLOT BOXES AS SHOWN IN THE RECENT ELECTION IN KUALA SELANGOR.
I had earlier written a letter posted on my blogg (re: http://yapchongyee.blogspot.com that Malaysia is not a democracy at all, but an oligarchy, the government has been by the same few families. This is where I am stating my point that Malay UMNO leaders have learned to “SPIN” and under the cover of spin they project the illusion that the government is an elected one when in truth the election of UMNO is by trickery, by ballot box stuffing. ALL MALAYSIANS MSUT WAKE UP TO THE FACT THAT THE GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA RETAINS POWER BY FRAUD. It serves no one in Malaysia be they Malays or Chinese or Indians. A nation is only as strong as when all thei people work together for equal rights & equal opportunities. I am not writing and arguing for equal rights for the Chinese, because I believe that our Chinese are better off migrating to Australia. I have also written in my last letter that the number of Chinese remains relatively the same number of 4.5 million at the time of Merdeka; this means that there has been very substantial emigration from Malaysia, most to Singapore. I am also not interested to put up suggestions for the improvement of Malaysia, That is something that nobody can do because it is already the mind set of the Malays that they are the superior race and that Malaysia belong to the Malays; but who is to say NO ? On the other hand IF THE MALAYS ARE SO SUPERIOR, WHY DO THEY STILL NOW NEED AFFIRMATIVE ACTIONS ? This shows that the Malays are an inferior race, and they cannot survive if left to fend for themselves.
It is sad that of the 24 million Malays only a handful have it all for the lest 50 years and yet they are unable to advance in real terms. The Malays of today is as deprived as they were and still are deprived today. I ask UMNO how many of the Malays have advanced in real terms today as they were 50 years ago. Yes ! There are many Malays living in the modern towns like PJ, BUT WHAT IS MORE TELLING OF THE TRUE SITUATION IS THE QUESTION, HOW MANY MORE OF THE 24 MILLION LIVE IN THE COUNTRY ? That is the more important question. From my perspective the true count of Malays benefiting from the NEP are the bureaucrats; and that could only be in the hundreds of thousands (NOT EVEN IN THE FUCKING 1 MILLION); then the question that follows is, what has happened to the other 23 million Malays rakyat living in the Kampongs ? What have to got out of voting for UMNO ? NOTHING, not a fucking thing. The true Malay rakyat has still to awaken to the fraud perpetrated by their UMNO, the Malay Party and spinner of fine hearing tales of the BOUNTY OF PLENTY THAT COME FROM DEPRIVING THE CHINESE & INDIANS.
My perspective is for the races of Malaysia to abolish the UMNO ploy of racism that do nothing for everybody else except to the sole benefit of UMNO leaders. I will write in my next letter to argue that it is time for all the races to abolish affirmative action because it benefits only the very, very few in UMNO. It is time to change Malaysian leaders and support the OPPOSITION; what UMNO tell the Malays are an ILLUSION.
MY NEXT LETTER after I show you what an illiterate in LAW that dumb arsehole this so called FEDERAL COURT JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI IS.
Anyone experience anything about the easy google profit kit? I discovered a lot of advertisements around it. I also found a site that is supposedly a review of the program, but the whole thing seems kind of sketchy to me. However, the cost is low so I’m going to go ahead and try it out, unless any of you have experience with this system first hand?
www.onlineuniversalwork
Post a Comment